United States v. Peralta-Sanchez

868 F.3d 852, 2017 WL 3598076, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 15954
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 22, 2017
DocketNos. 14-50393; 14-50394
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 868 F.3d 852 (United States v. Peralta-Sanchez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Peralta-Sanchez, 868 F.3d 852, 2017 WL 3598076, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 15954 (9th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER

Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing is hereby GRANTED.

The opinion and dissent filed February 7, 2017, Nos. 14-50393 and 14-50394, and appearing at 847 F.3d 1124, are withdrawn. It shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

A memorandum disposition is being simultaneously filed with this order. Judge Pregerson concurs in the judgment.

No further petitions for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained in this ease.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Rosendo Valdivias-Soto
112 F.4th 713 (Ninth Circuit, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
868 F.3d 852, 2017 WL 3598076, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 15954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-peralta-sanchez-ca9-2017.