United States v. Penuelas-Sanchez

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Penuelas-Sanchez

333 F. App'x 275

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 30, 2009

DocketNo. 07-50314

StatusPublished

This text of 333 F. App'x 275 (United States v. Penuelas-Sanchez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Penuelas-Sanchez, 333 F. App'x 275 (9th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

Gregorio Penuelas-Sanchez appeals from the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for importing cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Penuelas-Sanchez contends that the 60-month sentence imposed by the district court is unreasonable, in light of the 41-month sentence agreed to by both parties, because the 41-month sentence is sufficient but not greater than necessary to accomplish the goals of sentencing. The record reflects that the sentence imposed is reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors. See United States v. Nichols, 464 F.3d 1117, 1124-26 (9th Cir.2006).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI