United States v. Pena

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Pena. Read the opinion of the Court — 91 F.4th 813
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 11, 2026·No. 25-11218·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 25-11218 Document: 49-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/11/2026

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit

FILED No. 25-11218 June 11, 2026 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Michael Enrique Pena,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:21-CR-518-1 ______________________________

Before Clement, Southwick, and Oldham, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Michael Enrique Pena has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Pena has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 25-11218 Document: 49-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/11/2026

No. 25-11218

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Pena, (5th Cir. 2026).

United States v. Pena (United States v. Pena) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)