United States v. Pena

95 F. App'x 559
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Pena. Read the opinion of the Court — 72 F. App'x 232
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 20, 2004·No. 03-40331·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM. *

Jesus Pena, Jr., has appealed the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release and imposing a 36-month term of imprisonment. The district court did not abuse its discretion in ordering that the sentence be served consecutively to a term of imprisonment imposed in cause number C-02-292 for the law violation which resulted in the revocation of his supervised release. See United States v. Alexander, 100 F.3d 24, 27 (5th Cir.1996); see also U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(c), p.s., & comment. (n.6) (2002); U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3(f), p.s. (2002). The statutory maximum 36-month sentence was not in violation of law and was not plainly unreasonable. See United States v. Stiefel, 207 F.3d 256, 259 (5th Cir.2000) (standard of review).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Pena, 95 F. App'x 559 (5th Cir. 2004).

95 F. App'x 559 (United States v. Pena) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Stiefel
207 F.3d 256 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Stanley Alexander
100 F.3d 24 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)