United States v. Pena

286 F. App'x 40
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Pena. Read the opinion of the Court — 283 F. App'x 115
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 11, 2008·No. 08-6918·Unpublished

Opinion

*41 PER CURIAM:

Domingo Nolberto Pena appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Pena, No. 1:98-cr-00132-JCC-11 (E.D.Va. May 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Pena, 286 F. App'x 40 (4th Cir. 2008).

286 F. App'x 40 (United States v. Pena) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.