United States v. Pena-Aguilar
This text of 320 F. App'x 603 (United States v. Pena-Aguilar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jose Francisco Pena-Aguilar appeals from the 41-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Pena-Aguilar contends that the district court erred by applying a 16-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) because his statements at a prior state change of plea hearing were insufficient to establish that his prior state conviction for aggravated assault was a crime of violence. Because the factual basis set forth at the prior state change of plea hearing establishes that Pena-Aguilar fought with and struck a police officer, we conclude that the offense was a crime of violence. See U.S.S.G § 2L1.2, cmt. n. 1(B)(iii); see also United States v. Smith, 390 F.3d 661, 664-66 (9th Cir.2004), amended by 405 F.3d 726 (9th Cir.2005).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 F. App'x 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-pena-aguilar-ca9-2009.