United States v. Pena-Aguilar

320 F. App'x 603
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 25, 2009·No. No. 08-10230·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Francisco Pena-Aguilar appeals from the 41-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Pena-Aguilar contends that the district court erred by applying a 16-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) because his statements at a prior state change of plea hearing were insufficient to establish that his prior state conviction for aggravated assault was a crime of violence. Because the factual basis set forth at the prior state change of plea hearing establishes that Pena-Aguilar fought with and struck a police officer, we conclude that the offense was a crime of violence. See U.S.S.G § 2L1.2, cmt. n. 1(B)(iii); see also United States v. Smith, 390 F.3d 661, 664-66 (9th Cir.2004), amended by 405 F.3d 726 (9th Cir.2005).

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Pena-Aguilar, 320 F. App'x 603 (9th Cir. 2009).

320 F. App'x 603 (United States v. Pena-Aguilar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Timothy Dean Smith
390 F.3d 661 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Timothy Dean Smith
405 F.3d 726 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)