United States v. Pellegrino Millo
This text of 392 F.2d 591 (United States v. Pellegrino Millo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
392 F.2d 591
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Pellegrino MILLO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 513, Docket 29743.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
April 25, 1968.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
After we affirmed the conviction of Millo, 354 F.2d 224 (2 Cir. 1965), appellant petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to review that affirmance. The writ having been granted, the judgment of conviction in the district court and the judgment of this court affirming the conviction were vacated and the action was remanded to us, sub nom Piccioli v. United States, 390 U.S. 202, 88 S.Ct. 899, 19 L.Ed.2d 1034 (1968), for further consideration in the light of Marchetti v. United States, 390 U.S. 39, 88 S.Ct. 697, 19 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968).
After taking further consideration we now on the authority of Marchetti remand the case to the district court and direct that the indictment be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
392 F.2d 591, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-pellegrino-millo-ca2-1968.