United States v. Pedro Mireles-Sifuentes

445 F. App'x 810
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2011·No. 11-40625·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Pedro Mireles-Sifuentes presents an argument challenging his sentence on the grounds of double counting that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Calbat, 266 F.3d 358, 364 (5th Cir.2001), and United States v. Box, 50 F.3d 345, 359 (5th Cir.1995). See United States v. Duarte, 569 F.3d 528, 529-31 (5th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Pedro Mireles-Sifuentes, 445 F. App'x 810 (5th Cir. 2011).

445 F. App'x 810 (United States v. Pedro Mireles-Sifuentes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Calbat
266 F.3d 358 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Duarte
569 F.3d 528 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)