United States v. Pedro Mireles-Sifuentes

445 F. App'x 810
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 21, 2011
Docket11-40625
StatusUnpublished

This text of 445 F. App'x 810 (United States v. Pedro Mireles-Sifuentes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Pedro Mireles-Sifuentes, 445 F. App'x 810 (5th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Pedro Mireles-Sifuentes presents an argument challenging his sentence on the grounds of double counting that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Calbat, 266 F.3d 358, 364 (5th Cir.2001), and United States v. Box, 50 F.3d 345, 359 (5th Cir.1995). See United States v. Duarte, 569 F.3d 528, 529-31 (5th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Calbat
266 F.3d 358 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Duarte
569 F.3d 528 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
445 F. App'x 810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-pedro-mireles-sifuentes-ca5-2011.