United States v. Pedro Cruz-Valdez, Ruben Martin-Gonzalez, and Manuel Fortunado Ariza-Fuentes

753 F.2d 927, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 28071
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Pedro Cruz-Valdez, Ruben Martin-Gonzalez, and Manuel Fortunado Ariza-Fuentes. Read the opinion of the Court — 743 F.2d 1547
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 30, 1985·No. 82-5310·Published

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this court en banc without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Pedro Cruz-Valdez, Ruben Martin-Gonzalez, and Manuel Fortunado Ariza-Fuentes, 753 F.2d 927, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 28071 (11th Cir. 1985).

753 F.2d 927 (United States v. Pedro Cruz-Valdez, Ruben Martin-Gonzalez, and Manuel Fortunado Ariza-Fuentes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related