United States v. Pedro Aguilar-Quinones

451 F. App'x 671
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 3, 2011
Docket10-50398
StatusUnpublished

This text of 451 F. App'x 671 (United States v. Pedro Aguilar-Quinones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Pedro Aguilar-Quinones, 451 F. App'x 671 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Pedro Ivan Aguilar-Quinones appeals his conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Aguilar-Quinones’s motion for appointment of new counsel. Contrary to Aguilar-Quinones’s contentions, the district court made an adequate inquiry into his complaint and the record does not reflect that the conflict between Aguilar-Quinones and his counsel lead to a complete breakdown in communication or prevented Aguilar-Quinones from presenting an adequate defense. See United States v. Franklin, 321 F.3d 1231, 1239 (9th Cir.2003); United States v. McClendon, 782 F.2d 785, 789 (9th Cir.1986).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
451 F. App'x 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-pedro-aguilar-quinones-ca9-2011.