United States v. Peacock
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 10, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40127 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BILLY J. PEACOCK,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:03-CR-392-6 --------------------
Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel for Billy J. Peacock has moved for leave to withdraw
and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967). Peacock has not filed a response. Our review of
counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues
for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and
the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Peacock (United States v. Peacock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.