United States v. Payton

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Payton

583 F. App'x 215

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 25, 2014

DocketNo. 14-1143

StatusPublished

This text of 583 F. App'x 215 (United States v. Payton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Payton, 583 F. App'x 215 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles J. and Ruby Payton appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the government in the government’s action to reduce Mr. Payton’s tax liabilities to judgment, to set aside as fraudulent Mr. Payton’s conveyance of his interest in their marital residence to Mrs. Payton, and to foreclose tax liens against the residence and order its sale. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Payton, No. 4:13-cv-00055-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles J. and Ruby Payton appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the government in the government’s action to reduce Mr. Payton’s tax liabilities to judgment, to set aside as fraudulent Mr. Payton’s conveyance of his interest in their marital residence to Mrs. Payton, and to foreclose tax liens against the residence and order its sale. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Payton, No. 4:13-cv-00055-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

583 F. App'x 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-payton-ca4-2014.