United States v. Paxton

583 F. App'x 462
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 4, 2014·No. No. 14-50172·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Melissa Eunice Paxton has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Paxton has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Paxton, 583 F. App'x 462 (5th Cir. 2014).

583 F. App'x 462 (United States v. Paxton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zavala v. Shultz
S.D. Mississippi, 2020
Kristofor Kelley v. Jorge Castaneda, Warden
711 F. App'x 243 (Fifth Circuit, 2018)
Vauda Shipp, Jr. v. Rachel Chapa
698 F. App'x 202 (Fifth Circuit, 2017)
Nasir Ali v. Michael Carvajal, Warden
654 F. App'x 172 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)
Logan v. Warden Federal Correctional Complex Beaumont
644 F. App'x 280 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)
Daniels v. United States Penitentiary Warden
599 F. App'x 147 (Fifth Circuit, 2015)