United States v. Pavia
This text of United States v. Pavia (United States v. Pavia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 29, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
No. 03-41015 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
VERONICA M. PAVIA, Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CR-28-1 --------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Veronica
M. Pavia on direct appeal has filed a motion to withdraw and a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967).
Pavia has not filed a response. Our independent review of the
brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this
direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Pavia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-pavia-ca5-2004.