United States v. Paul Sakwa
This text of 900 F.2d 257 (United States v. Paul Sakwa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
900 F.2d 257
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Paul SAKWA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 89-6325.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 5, 1990.
Decided: March 22, 1990.
Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied May 8, 1990.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Richard L. Williams, District Judge. (CR No. 83-7-A, C/A No. 89-682-AM)
Paul Sakwa, appellant pro se.
Joseph John Aronica, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Va., for appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Paul Sakwa appeals from the district court's order dismissing Sakwa's petition for a writ of coram nobis. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Sakwa, CR No. 83-7-A, C/A No. 89-682-AM (E.D.Va. Aug. 29, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
900 F.2d 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-paul-sakwa-ca4-1990.