United States v. Paul S. Cooper

501 F.2d 1089, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7245
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 12, 1974·No. 72-3061·Published

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

We are here concerned with appellant’s conviction of the charge in Count *1090 I only of a ten count indictment. 1 In Count I he was charged with making false statements to United States agencies in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. These statements pertained to an investigation of possible violations of various rent regulations promulgated under the Economic Stabilization Act of 1970, 84 Stat. 799, (Aug. 15, 1970), as amended through January 27,1972.

Cooper’s argument that he was somehow entrapped and that his conviction is inconsistent with the trial court’s disposition of the other counts against him we find to be without merit. The evidence in support of his conviction of Count I was more than sufficient.

Affirmed.

1

. The case was first before the Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals. Por a factual recital and disposition of other counts see: United States v. Cooper, 482 F.2d 1393 (TECA 1973).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Paul S. Cooper, 501 F.2d 1089, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7245 (9th Cir. 1974).

501 F.2d 1089 (United States v. Paul S. Cooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Cooper
482 F.2d 1393 (Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals, 1973)