United States v. Paul Joseph Theriseaud

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Paul Joseph Theriseaud

456 F.2d 278

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 28, 1972

Docket71-2025

StatusPublished

This text of 456 F.2d 278 (United States v. Paul Joseph Theriseaud) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Paul Joseph Theriseaud, 456 F.2d 278 (5th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was convicted of violating Title 21 U.S.C.A., § 176a through the alleged importation of 53 pounds of marihuana into the United States from Mexico. The sole assignment of error is that the district court erred in denying appellant’s motion for acquittal based on the claimed insufficiency of the evidence.

We have carefully considered the evidence. It was more than ample to make an issue for the jury and to support the jury verdict of guilty.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was convicted of violating Title 21 U.S.C.A., § 176a through the alleged importation of 53 pounds of marihuana into the United States from Mexico. The sole assignment of error is that the district court erred in denying appellant’s motion for acquittal based on the claimed insufficiency of the evidence.

We have carefully considered the evidence. It was more than ample to make an issue for the jury and to support the jury verdict of guilty.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

456 F.2d 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-paul-joseph-theriseaud-ca5-1972.