United States v. Patterson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Patterson. Read the opinion of the Court — 211 F.3d 927
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 3, 1999·No. 97-60367·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-60367 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERT PATTERSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:96-CV-180-B - - - - - - - - - -

February 12, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert Patterson, federal prisoner #09268-042, argues that

the district court erred in denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion

in which he alleged that there was not a sufficient factual basis

to support his guilty plea conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c).

His motions to supplement the record and for an expedited appeal

are DENIED.

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties

and AFFIRM the denial of the motion substantially for the reasons

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 97-60367 -2-

stated by the district court. See United States v. Patterson,

No. 3:96-CV-180-B (N.D. Miss. April 22, 1997).

MOTIONS DENIED; AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Patterson, (5th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Patterson (United States v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related