United States v. Patterson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Patterson. Read the opinion of the Court — 22 F. App'x 163
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 5, 1999·No. 98-7547·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7547

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RICHARD M. PATTERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CR-97-60-A, CA-98-355-AM)

Submitted: April 29, 1999 Decided: May 5, 1999

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Durbin Hughes, IV, WADE & HUGHES, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Michael Edward Rich, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTOR- NEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Richard M. Patterson appeals the district court’s order deny-

ing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Patterson, Nos. CR-97-

60-A; CA-98-355-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 8, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Patterson, (4th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Patterson (United States v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related