United States v. Patterson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7547
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RICHARD M. PATTERSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CR-97-60-A, CA-98-355-AM)
Submitted: April 29, 1999 Decided: May 5, 1999
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Durbin Hughes, IV, WADE & HUGHES, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Michael Edward Rich, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTOR- NEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Richard M. Patterson appeals the district court’s order deny-
ing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.
1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-
tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
of the district court. See United States v. Patterson, Nos. CR-97-
60-A; CA-98-355-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 8, 1998). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Patterson (United States v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.