United States v. Patrick M. Isleib

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Patrick M. Isleib

458 F.2d 176, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10445

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 28, 1972·No. 71-3210·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On consideration of the record, we are convinced that the Government introduced sufficient evidence, expert and lay, to persuade the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that Isleib was not legally insane at the time he committed the armed robbery of which he was convicted below. Blake v. United States, 5 Cir. 1968, 407 F.2d 908; Mims v. United States, 5 Cir. 1967, 375 F.2d 135; United States v. Pitts, 5 Cir. 1970, 428 F.2d 534.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

On consideration of the record, we are convinced that the Government introduced sufficient evidence, expert and lay, to persuade the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that Isleib was not legally insane at the time he committed the armed robbery of which he was convicted below. Blake v. United States, 5 Cir. 1968, 407 F.2d 908; Mims v. United States, 5 Cir. 1967, 375 F.2d 135; United States v. Pitts, 5 Cir. 1970, 428 F.2d 534.

Affirmed.

United States v. Patrick M. Isleib, 458 F.2d 176, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10445 (5th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

458 F.2d 176 (United States v. Patrick M. Isleib) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Ryan Operations G.P., a Virginia General Partnership and Nvr, L.P., a Virginia Limited Partnership, on Behalf of Its Division, Nvr Building Products Co. v. Santiam-Midwest Lumber Co., an Oregon Corporation Furman Lumber, Inc., a Massachusetts Corporation Bright Wood Corp., an Oregon Corporation. Bright Wood Corp., Third Party v. Forrest Paint Co., Inc., an Oregon Corporation Guardsman Products, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Third Party Ryan Operations G.P. And Nvr, L.P. And Its Division, Nvr Building Products Co.

81 F.3d 355 (Third Circuit, 1996)

Opinion

Related