United States v. Patrick Green, Also Known as "K"
This text of 905 F.2d 1539 (United States v. Patrick Green, Also Known as "K") is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
Patrick GREEN, also known as "K" Defendant-Appellant
Nos. 89-3896, 89-3897.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 18, 1990.
Before KEITH and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, JOHN W. POTTER, District Judge*.
This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof, the court finds that there is substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury and that no prejudicial error has intervened.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is affirmed.
The Honorable John W. Potter, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
905 F.2d 1539, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 9880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-patrick-green-also-known-as-k-ca6-1990.