United States v. Patrick Bacon
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 4 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-50115
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 5:17-cr-00159-PA-2 Central District of California, v. Riverside
DANIEL RAY, AKA Popeye, AKA Daniel ORDER T. Ray, AKA Daniel Thomas Ray,
Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-50120 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 5:17-cr-00159-PA-1 v. PATRICK JOHN BACON, Defendant-Appellant.
. THOMAS, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that United States v. Bacon, No. 18-50120, be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated. The memorandum disposition is vacated with respect to United States
v. Bacon, No. 18-50120. The mandate remains in effect with respect to United States v. Ray, No. 18-50115.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
974 F.3d 959 (United States v. Patrick Bacon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.