United States v. Patrick Bacon

974 F.3d 959
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 4, 2020·No. 18-50120·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 4 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-50115

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 5:17-cr-00159-PA-2 Central District of California, v. Riverside

DANIEL RAY, AKA Popeye, AKA Daniel ORDER T. Ray, AKA Daniel Thomas Ray,

Defendant-Appellant.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-50120 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 5:17-cr-00159-PA-1 v. PATRICK JOHN BACON, Defendant-Appellant.

. THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that United States v. Bacon, No. 18-50120, be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated. The memorandum disposition is vacated with respect to United States

v. Bacon, No. 18-50120. The mandate remains in effect with respect to United States v. Ray, No. 18-50115.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Patrick Bacon, 974 F.3d 959 (9th Cir. 2020).

974 F.3d 959 (United States v. Patrick Bacon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Patrick Bacon
979 F.3d 766 (Ninth Circuit, 2020)