United States v. Patino-Hernandez
This text of 97 F. App'x 206 (United States v. Patino-Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jesus Patino-Hernandez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month sentence for one count of unlawful reentry into the United States by a previously deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for PatinoHernandez has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. PatinoHernandez has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 F. App'x 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-patino-hernandez-ca9-2004.