United States v. Parra

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Parra. Read the opinion of the Court — 111 F.4th 651
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 14, 2025·No. 24-10214·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 24-10214 Document: 71-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/14/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-10214 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ February 14, 2025 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Alonzo Parra, Jr.,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:20-CR-185-1 ______________________________

Before Haynes, Higginson, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Alonzo Parra, Jr. has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Parra has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Parra’s response. We

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 24-10214 Document: 71-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/14/2025

No. 24-10214

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Parra, (5th Cir. 2025).

United States v. Parra (United States v. Parra) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)