United States v. Parmer

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Parmer

440 F. App'x 193

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Parmer. Read the opinion of the Court — 352 F. App'x 854 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 26, 2011·No. No. 11-6501·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Mark Parmer appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2011) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Parmer v. United States, Nos. 4:08-cr-00019-F-1, 4:11-cv-00042-F, 2011 WL 1212712 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Mark Parmer appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2011) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Parmer v. United States, Nos. 4:08-cr-00019-F-1, 4:11-cv-00042-F, 2011 WL 1212712 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Parmer, 440 F. App'x 193 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

440 F. App'x 193 (United States v. Parmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related