United States v. Parks

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Parks. Read the opinion of the Court — 68 F.3d 860
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 9, 1996·No. 95-10813·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-10813 Conference Calendar __________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JACK BANNISTER PARKS, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CR-37-Y - - - - - - - - - - June 26, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, AND BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Jack Bannister Parks has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

and we have independently reviewed the brief and record and found

no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Parks, (5th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Parks (United States v. Parks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)