United States v. Parker

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

United States v. Parker

5 M.J. 916

CourtU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

DecidedAugust 31, 1978

DocketNCM 78 0680

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 5 M.J. 916 (United States v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Parker, 5 M.J. 916 (usnmcmilrev 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In his single assignment of error on appeal, appellant alleges the general order, which is the subject of Additional Charge I, is unlawful in that it is not reasonably necessary to protect members of the service. The general order in question is COMUSNAVPHILINST 1752.1H, dated 25 August 1976. This order promulgates information, policy, and administrative procedures concerning marriage of active duty U. S. Navy, Coast Guard, and Marine Corps personnel stationed in or visiting the Philippines. It requires these personnel who are not citizens of the Republic of the Philippines to obtain the written approval from Commander, U. S. Naval Forces, Philippines, prior to getting married in the Philippines.

This Court and the United States Court of Military Appeals have considered the lawfulness of similar regulations in numerous cases. United States v. Nation, 9 U.S.C.M.A. 724, 26 C.M.R. 504 (1958); United States v. Levinsky, 30 C.M.R. 641 (N.B.R. 1960); United States v. Wheeler, 12 U.S.C.M.A. 387, 30 C.M.R. 387 (1961); United States v. Mohr, No. 71 0044, (N.C.M.R. 9 April 1971). The appellant urges this Court to re-examine the law in this area, arguing that the passage of several years, and the consequent shift of social and military necessity, as well as changes in the regulation, justify a new inquiry.

We have examined COMUSNAVPHI-LINST 1752.1H, dated 25 August 1976 and the cases cited in the briefs of counsel. The instruction sets forth many of the complexities of service members marrying in the Philippines, recites needed procedures to be followed, and establishes reasonable requirements for approval prior to marriage. We find the instruction to be a lawful and reasonable exercise of command authority to safeguard and protect the morale, discipline, and usefulness of service personnel in the Philippines.

Accordingly, the findings and sentence of the court-martial, as approved by the convening and supervisory authorities, are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In his single assignment of error on appeal, appellant alleges the general order, which is the subject of Additional Charge I, is unlawful in that it is not reasonably necessary to protect members of the service. The general order in question is COMUSNAVPHILINST 1752.1H, dated 25 August 1976. This order promulgates information, policy, and administrative procedures concerning marriage of active duty U. S. Navy, Coast Guard, and Marine Corps personnel stationed in or visiting the Philippines. It requires these personnel who are not citizens of the Republic of the Philippines to obtain the written approval from Commander, U. S. Naval Forces, Philippines, prior to getting married in the Philippines.

This Court and the United States Court of Military Appeals have considered the lawfulness of similar regulations in numerous cases. United States v. Nation, 9 U.S.C.M.A. 724, 26 C.M.R. 504 (1958); United States v. Levinsky, 30 C.M.R. 641 (N.B.R. 1960); United States v. Wheeler, 12 U.S.C.M.A. 387, 30 C.M.R. 387 (1961); United States v. Mohr, No. 71 0044, (N.C.M.R. 9 April 1971). The appellant urges this Court to re-examine the law in this area, arguing that the passage of several years, and the consequent shift of social and military necessity, as well as changes in the regulation, justify a new inquiry.

We have examined COMUSNAVPHI-LINST 1752.1H, dated 25 August 1976 and the cases cited in the briefs of counsel. The instruction sets forth many of the complexities of service members marrying in the Philippines, recites needed procedures to be followed, and establishes reasonable requirements for approval prior to marriage. We find the instruction to be a lawful and reasonable exercise of command authority to safeguard and protect the morale, discipline, and usefulness of service personnel in the Philippines.

Accordingly, the findings and sentence of the court-martial, as approved by the convening and supervisory authorities, are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 M.J. 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-parker-usnmcmilrev-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack