United States v. Park Side Court, Inc., Roy E. Anderson and Joy Bright Ofstie, United States of America v. Seawyn Court, Inc., Roy E. Anderson and Joy Bright Ofstie

376 F.2d 853
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedMay 23, 1967
Docket16357_1
StatusPublished

This text of 376 F.2d 853 (United States v. Park Side Court, Inc., Roy E. Anderson and Joy Bright Ofstie, United States of America v. Seawyn Court, Inc., Roy E. Anderson and Joy Bright Ofstie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Park Side Court, Inc., Roy E. Anderson and Joy Bright Ofstie, United States of America v. Seawyn Court, Inc., Roy E. Anderson and Joy Bright Ofstie, 376 F.2d 853 (3d Cir. 1967).

Opinion

376 F.2d 853

UNITED STATES of America
v.
PARK SIDE COURT, INC., Roy E. Anderson and Joy Bright
Ofstie, Appellants.
UNITED STATES of America
v.
SEAWYN COURT, INC., Roy E. Anderson and Joy Bright Ofstie, Appellants.

Nos. 16356, 16357.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued May 5, 1967.
Decided May 23, 1967.

W. Louis Bossle, Damden, NJ., for appellants in both cases.

Donald G. Targan, Asst. U.S. Atty., Camden, N.J. (David M. Satz, Jr., U.S. Atty., Newark, N.J., on the brief), for appellee in both cases.

Before STALEY, Chief Judge, and BIGGS and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, intervenors in this mortgage foreclosure proceeding, sought an order to show cause who the mortgages should not be reinstated according to an alleged contract they had made with the Federal Housing Administration, mortgagee. We have carefully examined the record in these cases. We agree with the careful findings and comprehensive opinion of the district court, 257 F.Supp. 177 (D.N.J.1966), which concluded that no contract was entered into between the parties.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Park Side Court, Inc.
257 F. Supp. 177 (D. New Jersey, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
376 F.2d 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-park-side-court-inc-roy-e-anderson-and-joy-bright-ca3-1967.