United States v. Park Side Court, Inc.

Third Circuit

United States v. Park Side Court, Inc.

376 F.2d 853

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 23, 1967·No. Nos. 16356, 16357·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, interveners in this mortgage foreclosure proceeding, sought an order to show cause why the mortgages should not be reinstated according to an alleged contract they had made with the Federal Housing Administration, mortgagee. We have carefully examined the record in these cases. We agree with the careful findings and comprehensive opinion of the district court, 257 F.Supp. 177 (D.N.J.1966), which concluded that no contract was entered into between the parties.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, interveners in this mortgage foreclosure proceeding, sought an order to show cause why the mortgages should not be reinstated according to an alleged contract they had made with the Federal Housing Administration, mortgagee. We have carefully examined the record in these cases. We agree with the careful findings and comprehensive opinion of the district court, 257 F.Supp. 177 (D.N.J.1966), which concluded that no contract was entered into between the parties.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

United States v. Park Side Court, Inc., 376 F.2d 853 (3d Cir. 1967).

Pincite

376 F.2d 853 (United States v. Park Side Court, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related