United States v. Pannell

387 A.2d 736, 1978 D.C. App. LEXIS 474
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided June 28, 1978·No. No. 12135·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

On Petition for Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc

Before *NEWMAN, Chief Judge and KELLY, KERN, GALLAGHER, NEBEKER, YEAGLEY, HARRIS, *MACK and *FERREN, Associate Judges.

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

On consideration of appellant’s petition for rehearing or in the alternative for rehearing en banc, and it appearing that a majority of the judges of this Court have voted to deny the petition, it is

ORDERED that the en banc petition is denied; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED by the merits division that the petition for rehearing is denied.

Associate Judges NEBEKER and HARRIS would grant the petition for rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Pannell, 387 A.2d 736, 1978 D.C. App. LEXIS 474 (D.C. 1978).

387 A.2d 736 (United States v. Pannell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bailey
410 So. 2d 1123 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1982)