United States v. Paniagua-Ortiz
This text of 59 F. App'x 949 (United States v. Paniagua-Ortiz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Miguel Paniagua-Ortiz appeals the 18-month sentence and one year term of supervised release imposed following his guilty plea conviction for one count of illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
Paniagua-Ortiz’s contention that 18 U. S.C. § 3583 violates Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 [950]*950L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) is foreclosed by our recent decision in United States v. Liero, 298 F.3d 1175, 1177-78 (9th Cir.2002), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 123 S.Ct. 913, 154 L.Ed.2d 820 (2003).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the [950]*950courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 F. App'x 949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-paniagua-ortiz-ca9-2003.