United States v. Pangelinan
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
This is an appeal of the district court’s denial of a motion to vacate or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 because petitioner was no longer in custody.
Upon review of the record, the opening brief, and the May 19, 2008 letter from the United States Attorney, the court summarily reverses and remands this appeal to the district court. See Matus-Leva v. United States, 287 F.3d 758, 761 (9th Cir.2002) (an individual subject to supervised release is in custody for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petitions).
All pending motions are denied as moot.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
285 F. App'x 497 (United States v. Pangelinan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.