United States v. Palomon Sanchez-Lara

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 12, 2011·No. 10-50213·Unpublished

Opinion

FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 12 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50213

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:08-CR-03890-WQH-1 Southern District of California, v. San Diego

PALOMON SANCHEZ-LARA, ORDER AMENDING Defendant - Appellant. MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

Before: D.W. NELSON, BYBEE, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

The memorandum disposition filed on April 20, 2011, is amended as

follows:

Page 3, lines 8-9, remove “, for which he ultimately served 293 days in jail”

With the amendment to Memorandum Disposition, the panel has voted

unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Bybee and Judge M. Smith

voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Nelson recommended

denial of the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no

active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. (Fed.R.

App. P. 35.)

The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are

DENIED and no further petitions for rehearing and/or rehearing en banc will be

entertained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Palomon Sanchez-Lara, (9th Cir. 2011).

United States v. Palomon Sanchez-Lara (United States v. Palomon Sanchez-Lara) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.