United States v. Palomon Sanchez-Lara
Opinion
FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 12 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50213
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:08-CR-03890-WQH-1 Southern District of California, v. San Diego
PALOMON SANCHEZ-LARA, ORDER AMENDING Defendant - Appellant. MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC
Before: D.W. NELSON, BYBEE, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The memorandum disposition filed on April 20, 2011, is amended as
follows:
Page 3, lines 8-9, remove “, for which he ultimately served 293 days in jail”
With the amendment to Memorandum Disposition, the panel has voted
unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Bybee and Judge M. Smith
voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Nelson recommended
denial of the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no
active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. (Fed.R.
App. P. 35.)
The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are
DENIED and no further petitions for rehearing and/or rehearing en banc will be
entertained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Palomon Sanchez-Lara (United States v. Palomon Sanchez-Lara) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.