United States v. Palmer

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Palmer

675 F. App'x 371

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 3, 2017·No. No. 16-6918·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Eddie Palmer appeals the district court’s order denying his motion nunc pro tunc to adjust his sentence pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5G1.3(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Palmer, No. 2:93-cr-00090-AWA-2 (E.D. Va. June 28, 2016). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Eddie Palmer appeals the district court’s order denying his motion nunc pro tunc to adjust his sentence pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5G1.3(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Palmer, No. 2:93-cr-00090-AWA-2 (E.D. Va. June 28, 2016). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Palmer, 675 F. App'x 371 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

675 F. App'x 371 (United States v. Palmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.