United States v. Palardy
This text of 23 C.M.A. 318 (United States v. Palardy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
This case involves a problem which is substantially the same as that considered in United States v Carey, 23 USCMA 315, 49 CMR 605 (February 7, 1975). Appellant, by his plea, admitted from the outset his guilt and did not contest the post-trial showing that the court-martial was properly constituted. Because these same factors were persuasive in calling for the affirmance in United States v Carey, supra, we deem it appropriate to take like action here. Therefore, the decision of the Court of Military Review is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 C.M.A. 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-palardy-cma-1975.