United States v. Pachay

156 F. App'x 130
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedNovember 16, 2005
DocketNo. 05-11480; D.C. Docket No. 97-00709-CR-ASG
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 156 F. App'x 130 (United States v. Pachay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Pachay, 156 F. App'x 130 (11th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ana M. Jhones, appointed counsel for Newton Colombo Pachay in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Additionally, Pachay seeks appointment of substitute counsel. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Pachay’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Pachay’s motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chappell v. BUTTERFIELD-ODIN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 836
673 F. Supp. 2d 818 (D. Minnesota, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 F. App'x 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-pachay-ca11-2005.