United States v. Pabellon

279 F. App'x 243
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 30, 2008
Docket08-6363
StatusUnpublished

This text of 279 F. App'x 243 (United States v. Pabellon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Pabellon, 279 F. App'x 243 (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Sonji Prince Pabellón appeals the district court’s order granting in part her *244 motion for reduction of sentence and reducing her sentence from 121 months to 120 months. Pursuant to Amendment 706 to the Guidelines, which decreases by two levels the base offense levels for crack cocaine offenses, the district court reduced Pabellon’s previous offense level from 32 to 30. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“USSG”) § 2D1.1 (2007) (Amendment 706); USSG § lB1.10(c) (Mar. 3, 2008); United States v. Brewer, 520 F.3d 367, 373 (4th Cir.2008). In light of her criminal history category of I, Pabellón claims that she faced a potential sentencing range of 97 to 121 months under the Guidelines.

Pabellón notes that her previously imposed sentence of 121 months was at the bottom of the guideline range and therefore contends that the district court should have reduced her sentence to the bottom of the revised range, or to 97 months. We find this argument to be without merit. As set forth in the district court’s order, Pabellon’s amended guideline range was actually 120 to 121 months in light of the ten-year mandatory minimum sentence applicable to her offense. See 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(b)(1)(A) (West 1999 & Supp.2007). Despite Pabellon’s arguments to the contrary, the district court lacked authority to sentence her below the statutory mandatory minimum sentence as she requested. See United States v. Allen, 450 F.3d 565, 568-69 (4th Cir.2006).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order and the resulting 120-month sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Richard Daniel Allen
450 F.3d 565 (Fourth Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Brewer
520 F.3d 367 (Fourth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 F. App'x 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-pabellon-ca4-2008.