United States v. Owens

236 F. App'x 146
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Owens. Read the opinion of the Court — 224 F. App'x 429
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 21, 2007·No. 06-11107·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ricky Leon Owens has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Owens has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Owens’ claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Owens’ response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Owens, 236 F. App'x 146 (5th Cir. 2007).

236 F. App'x 146 (United States v. Owens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Cantwell
470 F.3d 1087 (Fifth Circuit, 2006)
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)