United States v. Owens
This text of United States v. Owens (United States v. Owens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 20, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
No. 02-21349 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DANNY ODELL OWENS,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-02-CR-307-2 --------------------
Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Danny Odell Owens has filed a
motion for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Owens has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel
is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL
IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Owens, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-owens-ca5-2003.