United States v. Owens
This text of United States v. Owens (United States v. Owens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7701
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMES JOSEPH OWENS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilson. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (8:78-cr-00017-F-1)
Submitted: January 30, 2009 Decided: February 24, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Joseph Owens, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
James Joseph Owens appeals the district court’s orders
directing amendment of the presentence report and denying Owens’
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Owens,
No. 8:78-cr-00017-F-1 (E.D.N.C. June 26 & Aug. 7, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Owens, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-owens-ca4-2009.