United States v. Owen Maxwell Frye

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Owen Maxwell Frye

416 F.2d 963

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 24, 1969

Docket13518

StatusPublished

This text of 416 F.2d 963 (United States v. Owen Maxwell Frye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Owen Maxwell Frye, 416 F.2d 963 (4th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

From his conviction on March 13, 1969 in the Federal District Court for Maryland of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113, Owen Maxwell Frye appeals. For reversal he asserts error in the District Judge’s rulings at trial and inadequacy of the evidence to convict. As we find no substance in these assignments against the rulings and appraise the evidence as amply warranting the jury’s verdict of guilty, the judgment and sentence thereon will not be disturbed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

From his conviction on March 13, 1969 in the Federal District Court for Maryland of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113, Owen Maxwell Frye appeals. For reversal he asserts error in the District Judge’s rulings at trial and inadequacy of the evidence to convict. As we find no substance in these assignments against the rulings and appraise the evidence as amply warranting the jury’s verdict of guilty, the judgment and sentence thereon will not be disturbed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

416 F.2d 963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-owen-maxwell-frye-ca4-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack