United States v. Overcast
132 F. App'x 677
This text of 132 F. App'x 677 (United States v. Overcast) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Overcast, 132 F. App'x 677 (8th Cir. 2005).
Opinion
John W. Overcast appeals the sentence the district court
Having conducted an independent review under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Thus, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.
The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
132 F. App'x 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-overcast-ca8-2005.