United States v. Osvaldo Ceballos-Zuniga
This text of 380 F. App'x 417 (United States v. Osvaldo Ceballos-Zuniga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Osvaldo Ceballos-Zuniga (Cebados) has appealed his jury conviction of illegal reentry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Cebados argues that, under the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 2527, 174 L.Ed.2d 314 (2009), the district court’s admission of a certificate of nonexistence of record (CNR), to show that Cebados had not applied for admission to the United States, violated his rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment.
As Cebados concedes, this court’s review is for plain error. See United States v. Martinez-Rios, 595 F.3d 581, 584 (5th Cir.2010). Because there was ample other evidence that Cebados had not applied for admission to the United States, Cebados cannot show that the district court’s error in admitting the CNR affected his substantial rights. See id. at 587. The judgment is
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
380 F. App'x 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-osvaldo-ceballos-zuniga-ca5-2010.