United States v. Ostos-Del Angel
This text of 136 F. App'x 659 (United States v. Ostos-Del Angel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Antonio Ostos-Del Angel (Ostos) appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for importation into the United States from Mexico of approximately 31 kilograms of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a), 960(a)(1) & (b)(1)(B) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Ostos argues for the first time on appeal that 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960(a) & (b) are unconstitutional in light of [660]*660the Supreme Court’s decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). As Ostos concedes, this argument is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580 (5th Cir.2000).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
136 F. App'x 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ostos-del-angel-ca5-2005.