United States v. Oster
This text of 249 F. App'x 652 (United States v. Oster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Connie Isabelle Oster appeals from the 180-month sentence imposed after her jury-trial conviction for possession and distribution of over 500 grams of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846 and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Appellant contends her sentence is unreasonable because it is greater than necessary under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and because it results in an unwarranted sentence disparity among similarly-situated defendants under § 3553(a)(6). We conclude that appellant’s sentence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Mix, 457 F.3d 906, 912-13 (9th Cir.2006); see also United States v. Reina-Rodriguez, 468 F.3d 1147, 1158-59 (9th Cir.2006) (holding that sentence disparity is not unreasonable where co-defendant pled guilty and appellant did not).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 F. App'x 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-oster-ca9-2007.