United States v. Oscar Torres, Daniel Narvaez, Javier Dario Gomez
This text of 718 F.2d 998 (United States v. Oscar Torres, Daniel Narvaez, Javier Dario Gomez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
718 F.2d 998
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Oscar TORRES, Daniel Narvaez, Javier Dario Gomez,
Defendants-Appellants.
No. 81-5827.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
Nov. 3, 1983.
Weiner, Robbins, Tunkey & Ross, William Tunkey, Geoffrey C. Fleck, Miami, Fla., for Torres and Narvaez.
Bruce H. Fleisher, Coral Gables, Fla., for Javier Dario Gomez.
Stanley Marcus, U.S. Atty., Robert J. Bondi, Jon May, Asst. U.S. Attys., Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
The submission of this case to the court en banc is VACATED, but the vacation of the panel opinion, 705 F.2d 1287, remains in effect. The case is REMANDED to the panel for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
718 F.2d 998, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-oscar-torres-daniel-narvaez-javier-dario-gomez-ca11-1983.