United States v. Oscar Ellis, Jr.

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Oscar Ellis, Jr.

60 F.3d 825, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24969, 1995 WL 406653

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJuly 11, 1995

Docket95-6140

StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 825 (United States v. Oscar Ellis, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Oscar Ellis, Jr., 60 F.3d 825, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24969, 1995 WL 406653 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

60 F.3d 825
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Oscar ELLIS, Jr., Defendant--Appellant.

No. 95-6140.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 22, 1995.
Decided July 11, 1995.

Oscar Ellis, Jr., appellant pro se. Mary Ann Snow, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ellis, Nos. CR-92-114; CA-94-1142 (E.D. Va. Jan. 3, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel because the appeal presents no complex issues. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

60 F.3d 825
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Oscar ELLIS, Jr., Defendant--Appellant.

No. 95-6140.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 22, 1995.
Decided July 11, 1995.

Oscar Ellis, Jr., appellant pro se. Mary Ann Snow, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ellis, Nos. CR-92-114; CA-94-1142 (E.D. Va. Jan. 3, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel because the appeal presents no complex issues. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F.3d 825, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24969, 1995 WL 406653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-oscar-ellis-jr-ca4-1995.