United States v. Oscar Delgadillo

607 F. App'x 410
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 16, 2015
Docket14-41197
StatusUnpublished

This text of 607 F. App'x 410 (United States v. Oscar Delgadillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Oscar Delgadillo, 607 F. App'x 410 (5th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Oscar Delgadillo raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir.2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and quantity is not an element of a 21 U.S.C. § 841 offense. Knowledge of drug type and quantity likewise is not an element of offenses under the related statutes of 21 U.S.C. § 952(a) and § 960(a). United States v. Valencia-Gonzales, 172 F.3d 344, 345-46 (5th Cir.1999); United States v. Restrepo-Granda, 575 F.2d 524, 527 (5th Cir.1978). The unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Valencia-Gonzales
172 F.3d 344 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Betancourt
586 F.3d 303 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
607 F. App'x 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-oscar-delgadillo-ca5-2015.