United States v. Oscar Chicoj-Mejia

605 F. App'x 391
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 21, 2015
Docket14-41101
StatusUnpublished

This text of 605 F. App'x 391 (United States v. Oscar Chicoj-Mejia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Oscar Chicoj-Mejia, 605 F. App'x 391 (5th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Oscar Thomas Chicoj-Mejia raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Morales-Mota, 704 F.3d 410, 412 (5th Cir.2013). In Morales-Mota, 704 F.3d at 412, we rejected the argument that the Texas offense of “burglary of a habitation” is broader than the generic, contemporary definition of “burglary of a dwelling” under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) because it defines the “owner” of a habitation as a person with a “greater right to possession of the property than the actor.” Accordingly, the unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Francisco Morales-Mota
704 F.3d 410 (Fifth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
605 F. App'x 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-oscar-chicoj-mejia-ca5-2015.