United States v. Osborne

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Osborne. Read the opinion of the Court — 68 F.3d 94
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 24, 1996·No. 95-31120·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-31120

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DONALD RAY OSBORNE Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Middle District of Louisiana (CR-95-4-B-M2)

July 17, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

A failure to act with knowledge of a disparate impact upon

minorities does not constitute a failure to act because of a

disparate impact upon minorities. Congress need not agree with the

factual recommendations of a federal agency.

AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Osborne, (5th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Osborne (United States v. Osborne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.